Template talk:clipping of

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Benwing2 in topic RFM discussion: March 2019
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@Ultimateria: I see you've requested a merge with {{clipping}}, but {{clipping of}} is meant to be used in definition lines (with italicisation), while {{clipping}} is an etymology template (without italicisation), so they shouldn't be merged. Or do you mean to get rid of "clipping of" from definition lines, and move all instances to etymology sections? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Per utramque cavernam: Aaand it's the first line of both templates. Woops. I do think those two uses should be separate, but from the names the distinction wasn't readily apparent. Thanks for pointing out the difference. Ultimateria (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

RFM discussion: March 2019[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I prefer the parameters of {{clipping}} (which has the language code as the first parameter) and the formatting of {{clipping of}} (which uses italics), but it's absurd that we should have both of these equivalent templates. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

BTW @Metaknowledge Part of my form-of cleanup work was adding support for having the language code as the first parameter to all of the form-of templates, which includes {{clipping of}}. They still support |lang= as well. I'm in the process of cleaning up the documentation of all these templates to reflect the preference for language code as first parameter. Benwing2 (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply