Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2006-10/User:A-cai

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:A-cai

  • User:A-cai would be a fine and useful admin. Eight months in, he has made a boatload of contributions to our Chinese (by which I mean Mandarin and Min Nan) and Japanese coverage, and to our policies for effectively presenting entries in these very different tongues and scripts. In short, it would be nice to have another admin with skills in these areas, since how many of us could spot and eradicate nonsense in Chinese?
  • bd2412 T 13:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Acceptance:
    • Accept.

A-cai 21:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support \Mike 13:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Connel MacKenzie 13:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oh, and support , of course! bd2412 T 14:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support EncycloPetey 14:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC) --EncycloPetey 14:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. —Stephen 15:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Robert Ullmann 15:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC) yes![reply]
  7. Support TheDaveRoss 04:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Absolutely! DAVilla 08:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support, of course. A very high quality of contributions. Widsith 08:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Kipmaster 13:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support --Enginear 16:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support I think the reasons are obvious -- Tawker 06:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Versageek 07:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support, due to the indefatigable and prolific nature of, creation of, and contributions to various East Asian language entries, willingness to share knowledge via "discussion," and creativity of devising various new templates and solutions for said entries. One of the better contributors here. Badagnani 22:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Jonathan Webley 08:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support SemperBlotto 13:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Decision