Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Vahagn Petrosyan for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Vahagn Petrosyan for admin[edit]

  • Vote ends: 23:59 24 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 00:00 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. Support —Stephen 22:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 05:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Ivan Štambuk 06:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support 50 Xylophone Players talk 16:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) From the various new pages he created which I noticed in RC I see no reason to oppose this promotion. --50 Xylophone Players talk 16:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support though I can't judge about the Armenian entries by any means. -- Gauss 20:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Bogorm 17:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

  1. Oppose H. (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Not enough experience and knowledge about common practices yet. Does not use {{t}}, {{i}} at appropriate places. Will change to support if he proves he wants to learn about these and applies them, along with other good practices.[reply]
  2. Oppose. I'm sorry. This editor seems to be a wonderful contributor, and he's contributed an amazing amount to the main namespace. However, he's still fairly new, and has engaged in almost no discussions; I just don't feel comfortable voting for an admin when I can't get any sense of his personality, of how he interacts with other editors. (I actually think it's really praiseworthy that he's so focused on adding content — discussions generally aren't as productive as that — and you can be sure that I don't at all mean this comment as criticism. I'm sure that if/when I get to know him better, I'll happily vote in support.) —RuakhTALK 07:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Late vote, but should be counted anyway, I think.--Neskaya kanetsv 07:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain[edit]

  1. Abstain Conrad.Irwin 12:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Looks good, but still very new.[reply]
  2. Abstain Neskaya kanetsv 22:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC) Too new, honestly. Have had no interaction to base either a positive or negative vote on though. --Neskaya kanetsv 22:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decision[edit]