Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Atitarev for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Atitarev for admin[edit]

  • Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Acceptance: Nominees: I hereby accept my nomination for admin.
    • Languages: ru, en-4, de-4, fr-3, pl-3, uk-3, zh-2, ja-2, cs-2, be-2, es-2, sv-2, no-2, da-2, fi-1, it-1, ar-1, ko-1, hi-1, vi-1, th-1
    • Timezone: Melbourne, Australia - Summer (DST) AEST (UTC+10), AEDT (UTC+11) --Anatoli 15:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support[edit]

  1. Support Pharamp 17:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Razorflame 21:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. I thought that he already was an admin... --Yair rand 00:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support he isn't already? L☺g☺maniac 01:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Leo Laursen - (talk * contribs) 23:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Tooironic 03:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Always helpful, always friendly, and knowledgeable in a number of languages. An asset to the team! Good bloke too. :)[reply]
  7. Support --Stephen 07:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support --Internoob (Disc.Cont.) 02:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Ultimateria 02:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. I'm actually really surprised to hear that he isn't one ... so confusing. --RuakhTALK 16:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Tohru 17:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support --Vahagn Petrosyan 17:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support --Dan Polansky 18:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Equinox 18:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support  (u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 20:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support I second Ruakh's comment...50 Xylophone Players talk 00:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Rising Sun talk? 00:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC). I think we've tracked down and nominated all the surprised-they're-not-admins (or STNAs as I call them) now. alluding to the high number of open admin votes happening at the moment[reply]
  18. Support Ivan Štambuk 14:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support DAVilla 07:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support --Makaokalani 17:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Since he isn't an admin already, seems high time he become one. --Neskaya contribstalk? 23:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

  1. Abstain Mglovesfun (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC). Only because the user doesn't undo revisions or nominate things for speedy deletion, or other things I associate with future admins. I wish him (her?) luck however. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment. I do occasionally (nominate and undo revisions), of course for things on my big watchlist and things I notice but I will try to be more active in these areas. I wish him (her?) luck however. Thank you and it's "him" (male). Anatoli Titarev. --Anatoli 23:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decision[edit]