Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:DerekWinters for admin[edit]

Support[edit]

Oppose[edit]

  1. Oppose not because I think he'd be an abusive admin, but because he's still something of a newbie and is not ready for a position of authority. Especially problematic is that he has added entries in languages that he does not mark himself as being proficient in and which do not seem to be citable per the CFI, and when I mentioned this to him, did not even respond to my queries. Admins have to know the rules inside out so that they can enforce them and instruct newbies, but DW has a ways to go. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per Metaknowledge; unattested created terms are a problem. Can be elected in future when there are no recent cases of such terms. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain[edit]

  1. Abstain - He could very well be a useful addition, but I never support such a nomination if it comes from WF. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decision[edit]