Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Koavf for admin[edit]

Nomination: I hereby nominate Koavf (talkcontribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Friendly, polite and experienced contributor; I believe he'll put the admin tools to good use.

See User_talk:Koavf#Adminship for previous discussion.

Schedule:

Acceptance:

  • Languages: en-N, es-2, de-1, pt-1 (and 1 on other Romance languages)
  • Timezone: UTC+ 4
Thanks to Rerum for the nomination. @Equinox, PseudoSkull: who commented on my talk regarding this. Also @AryamanA, Daniel_Carrero, Donnanz who may have opinions on this topic pro- or con- and @Metaknowledge, DTLHS, wikitiki89, xbony2, Andrew Sheedy, Victar, Robbie SWE, Mahagaja, Vahagn Petrosyan since they voted on me before for another issue. I would encourage everyone to take a look at this unsuccessful CheckUser vote and the recent discussion of de-sysopping 19 admins for context, and this cross-activity tool or Special:CentralAuth/Koavf to get an idea of what I do around the WMF projects and how I've used advanced user rights elsewhere; I've been on this project since 2005 and have become much more active since 2013 or so. If anyone has concerns, questions, etc. I'll be happy to address them. —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support[edit]

  1. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support We did have a serious clash a while ago, but since then we have been able to co-operate. So I'm prepared to give Justin a chance, he would probably be a better admin than I ever would (I have no ambitions). DonnanZ (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, you had me at "ping" :-) --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support I know this user to be extremely nice and happy and positive. Also, Koavf is a very trustworthy editor both here and on other projects, and has been here a long time. He really knows his way around and knows what he's doing, and clearly enjoys to do what he does. PseudoSkull (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support I have encountered Koavf across several Wikimedia projects and though we have had disagreements, his manner is polite and respectful. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support --Tom 144 (𒄩𒇻𒅗𒀸) 00:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support I had oppositions to Koavf being a bureaucrat, but I think he'd be a great admin. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करेंयोगदान) 15:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. SupportJberkel 15:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Equinox 22:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support = TheDaveRoss 13:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SupportVorziblix (talk · contribs) 21:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SupportMahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 09:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. SupportUngoliant (falai) 01:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]

Passes 15–0. Could a bureaucrat amend my user rights, please? Thanks to whomever does and everyone for the vote of confidence. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Add your name to WT:Admins, please. —Stephen (Talk) 00:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]