Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-01/Make Frankish an etymology-only variant of Proto-West Germanic

What now?

@Victar, Andrew Sheedy, Mnemosientje, Rua This vote passed almost a month ago, but it doesn't like anything has been done about implementing it. Also, what do we do about our one attested Frankish entry, ᚨᚾᚾ? —Mahāgaja · talk 22:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mahagaja: I'm not an admin so I can't restore the Frankish entries @Rua deleted. --{{victar|talk}} 04:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@Victar: I thought she re-created them as West Germanic entries anyway, didn't she? Anyway, that seems like the least of the issues. As an admin, I can easily go to Module:languages/data3/f and remove "frk", and then go to Module:etymology languages/data and add "frk", but I'm not sure what the consequences after that will be. Will that create a thousand module errors at CAT:E that will require a bot to clean up? —Mahāgaja · talk 15:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mahagaja: I created a vote to a) make the change official, because demoting a language with over a hundred entries to a dialect should be something that's voted on, and b) instead of moving Frankish entries to Proto-West Germanic ones, @Rua was deleting them, and expunging their edit histories by doing so, which needed to stop. --{{victar|talk}} 19:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia's article on the Bergakker inscription says it may be considered the earliest attestation of Old Dutch, so I'm reassigning ᚨᚾᚾ to Old Dutch so that Frankish can become an etymology-only variant of a reconstructed language. —Mahāgaja · talk 14:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)