Talk:breast cancer

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by TAKASUGI Shinji in topic breast cancer
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


breast cancer[edit]

"Cancer of the breast." Mglovesfun (talk) 21:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am inclined towards deleting these. The only reason they should remain is they might be idiomatic in other languages. JamesjiaoTC 21:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Keep for translations like James said. —CodeCat 21:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
"For translations" is not a valid criterion for inclusion. It's also not a very sensible one IMO, as it lets in a whole heck of a lot of things we don't want.​—msh210 (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
It could very easily mean "cancer of the breast (fleshy organ)" or "cancer of the breast (chest)" and, in my (thank God) limited experience, it only means the former. If my experience matches actual usage (or current usage) then keep per WT:CFI#Idiomaticity.​—msh210 (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Keep, set term, great for translations, men can get it too and they don't have breasts.Lucifer 18:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh bugger, didn't think of that, keep. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Men do not have breasts? Do you even know what a breast is? --Pilcrow 20:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
No they don't because breast means tits to most people, if you ask a doctor they will tell you men do have atrophied undeveloped mammary glands and that this means like pre-pubescent girls they have "breasts" but this usage is rare, therefore men do not have breasts, as they are generally meant to be the big (hopefully) beautiful squishy things you grab onto while your nailing your lady. — This unsigned comment was added by Luciferwildcat (talkcontribs) at 09:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC).Reply

We have earlier deleted prostate cancer. Logic? --Hekaheka 22:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think prostate cancer effects anything but the prostate, or else it's prostate and colon cancer, etc. But I may be wrong, oncology is not my specialty.Lucifer 03:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, according to WP "Prostate cancer most commonly metastasizes to the bones, lymph nodes, and may invade rectum, bladder and lower ureters after local progression." I don't think there is a cancer that limits itself into one organ. If there is, it should be specifically mentioned as the cancer that does not affect any other organ. I'd say we either include all X cancers or we don't. --Hekaheka 06:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well that can go either way, there seems to be 3 potential groups here. Cancer of only X, Cancer called X but can start anywhere in the neighborhood, or Cancer X which certain will effect it's neighborhood. I think we should then keep them all since it would be interesting to know what the neighborhood is.Lucifer 21:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Keep, see also the above RFD. --Anatoli (обсудить) 06:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kept. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply