Talk:π‘˜–π‘˜²π‘˜•π‘˜œπ‘˜Ή

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bhagadatta
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@Kutchkutch If we are to be consistent then yes, *jΚ°Δ«yate should be called Ashokan Prakrit. But then, applying sound laws and everything, the Old Indo-Aryan predecessor of *jhΔ«yate will also be *jΚ°Δ«yΓ‘te, which existed along with *gαΊ“Δ«yΓ‘te and the attested variant, kαΉ£Δ«yΓ‘te. But the ambiguity persists due to CDIAL reconstructing terms with /Ε›/, /αΉ£/ and certain consonant clusters (/tr/, /dr/, /ts/, /ty/, /dy/ to name a few) which one would not expect to find in a Prakrit so I won't be surprised if this issue rears its head again some time in the future. I think another discussion on this topic is warranted when the time comes.... -- 𝓑𝓱π“ͺ𝓰π“ͺ𝓭π“ͺ𝓽𝓽π“ͺ(𝓽π“ͺ𝓡𝓴) 14:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Bhagadatta: Since this is an issue that keeps rearing its head, we can leave the resolution for that discussion. According to Reconstruction talk:Sanskrit/ΰ€§ΰ₯ΰ€΅ΰ€œΰ€¦ΰ€£ΰ₯ΰ€‘, the earliest that such a discussion could happen is after the Prakrit merger. Kutchkutch (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kutchkutch: Thanks for finding that discussion. I couldn't recall where it was. It'll be easier to keep track of things to discuss after the merger:
  1. Status of CDIAL reconstructions
  2. Using Devanagari script entries as altforms for Prakrit or at least showing the Devanagari spelling in Brahmi entries (Template talk:inc-extension). -- 𝓑𝓱π“ͺ𝓰π“ͺ𝓭π“ͺ𝓽𝓽π“ͺ(𝓽π“ͺ𝓡𝓴) 10:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply